Giant Manufacturing, based in Taiwan, is widely regarded as the world’s largest bicycle maker. In addition to its own Giant and Liv brands, the company produces frames for many leading names in the industry, much like TSMC manufactures chips for Apple, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. While its current customer list isn’t public, Giant has historically built bikes for Trek, Scott, Colnago, Specialized, Canyon, and others. The scale is immense, with production topping one million bicycles a year.
Giant’s role in the cycling industry is, fittingly, giant. Before diving into earnings, a few caveats. The company trades on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (9921) and reports in New Taiwan Dollars (TWD), which creates differences compared to U.S.-listed peers like Fox Factory (FOXF). Reporting standards vary, conference calls aren’t held, and filings are less detailed than what you’d expect from a U.S. public company. In short, this is a higher-level, less granular review, but still a worthwhile one.
Thanks for reading Jeff’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Q2 Results:
- Revenue – NT$15.75B ($520M) vs NT$16.85B in Q1 (q/q)
- Adjusted* net profit before tax of NT$590M ($19.6M) vs NT$4.25B q/q
- Gross margins were said to be 20.4% vs 21.7% q/q
- Adjusted net margin before tax is ~3.7%.
- Year over Year Comparison: Compared to last year, sales for the quarter is down 25.6%.
- Sales trend over the Year: When analyzing sales over the course of the year compared to the prior year any positive trend seen early in 2025 has reversed. We’ll get into the “why” in analysis.
Where Are We?
When I look through Giant’s sales numbers on a yearly basis over the last 10 years, it appears we’ve “gone back” to pre-COVID times with this year’s monthly sales most closely matching 2018 or 2019. Those who want to check it out, here is a link to revenue by month across all years dating back to 2015. Obviously, this is just sales and does not show us anything else about the company, such as their balance sheet, COGS, how SG&A is moving etc, but if our goal is to gain insight as to the state of the broader industry, I believe this is a worthwhile point of inference.
Analysis & Takeaways
Before diving into the big-picture takeaways, two critical factors need to be addressed: tariffs and foreign exchange. Tariffs remain one of the biggest headwinds in the industry. For Giant, the challenge is twofold: managing tariffs on its own branded bikes while also staying flexible for its many white-label customers, who may respond differently—canceling orders, shifting shipping routes, or adjusting timing (all disruptive and costly). I’ve said it before: tariffs distract management from the real work of running a successful company and instead force constant attention on an artificial, unpredictable, and highly impactful variable. This likely explains February’s relative strength versus the rest of the year, and it could also be a key driver of broader underperformance in 2025
Foreign exchange is another major pressure point. The New Taiwan Dollar (NT$) has appreciated roughly 10–11% this year against the U.S. dollar, Indian rupee, and Chinese yuan. That strength creates a significant headwind: products become more expensive in those markets, leading to softer demand, margin compression, or both. Layer this on top of tariffs, a weak consumer environment, and the lingering inventory overhang we’ve already discussed, and it’s clear why management is fighting uphill on multiple fronts.
On profitability, Q2 was brutal. Net profit collapsed ~86% compared to Q1, despite revenue only slipping ~6.5%. Why such a gap? Tariffs and FX played a role, but management also cited ‘discounts and inventory clean-up.’ Add in Giant’s high fixed cost base; factories, labor, and infrastructure, and the math gets ugly fast. When gross margin takes even a modest hit, it cascades into a disproportionate collapse in net profit. **Now, all this being said, this is where I’m just not given the same level of detail I might get if Giant was trading on a US exchange. There might be other reasons profitability fell, and some might be based around non-cash accounting charges or other one time expenses. I mention this because this should be taken with a giant grain of salt.
So, big picture what does this all mean? Giant’s earnings and sales data suggest the cycling industry is still working through significant pain: part COVID hangover, part fallout from U.S. policy decisions. That said, it’s important not to over-interpret a single data point. One quarter doesn’t tell the whole story. With Giant, I’ve essentially just scratched the surface, peeled back the first layer of the onion. The deeper you go, the more complexity you uncover, so keep in mind this is a (very) surface level look.
Compared to Fox, Giant’s results look far less encouraging—top-line isn’t growing, and the outlook is weaker. Fox is more diversified, and even they flagged a more cautious 2026 for bikes on their latest call (I’ve included the analyst Q&A at the bottom of this post). The real concern with Giant is that they’re not just lagging the COVID-era boom years (2020–2022), which will likely remain a high-water mark for a decade, they’re also underperforming 2024, a year already viewed as ‘down.
The silver lining is that a return to pre-COVID sales levels, against a larger overall market, should, in theory, help stabilize things. I’ve written before about the ‘bike monster’ analogy: the market is the monster (demand) and the food the monster eats is supply (bikes). The monster can only eat so many bikes in a sitting before it gets sick. As KTM has shown, forcing the monster to “fast” by cutting supply can restore balance and make for a happy monster again (to be seen, but appears to be working). The problem for bicycles is structural: far more players, more niche segments, and far less coordination. It’s a classic prisoner’s dilemma, if everyone paused supply at once, the market could reset. But that won’t happen. Instead, the industry will likely be dragging this hangover, in some form, well into 2026. And whatever normalization is present will be a bit more gun-shy then we’ve seen the last handful of years. But hey, as always, I don’t have a crystal ball and I’m probably over-reading a few things here; we humans tend to do that!
Cheers, and as always if anyone wants to reach out – feel free to do so – jeff.brines@gmail.com
—Fox QA from Earnings Call —
Peter MacGeldrick, Analyst, Stifel: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I was curious on the bike business. You mentioned year to date growth. I was hoping you could size the rate of growth and year to date within SSG for the bike business.
And then I’m interested in the timing of model year sequencing and the inversion that you referenced in the prepared remarks. Could you just set the backdrop for the comparisons and how visibility to orders are developing?
Mike Dennison, Chief Executive Officer, Fox Factory:A lot of that growth in SSG in the first half of the year did come from our bike business, which getting to your bigger point was a function of bike OEMs eliminating the prior year product inventory successes and really focusing on new product for new product launches to really bring that consumer into bike shops to buy bikes. That was a great signal for us to see that these bike companies were getting healthier and stabilizing and getting back on the gas relative or the pedal relative to growing their businesses. So that drove a lot of that growth in the first half. When I talk about the back half moderating, it’s actually a positive. The reason why I say it’s a positive is because keep in mind, these OEMs have lived a life of excess inventory that’s been incredibly painful over the last two years.
So as they think about ending ’twenty five on solid footing and being prepared for ’twenty six, new growth with new models, they really want to make sure they don’t repeat past mistakes and have excessive inventory in the back half. What does that do in terms of product or book of business or to how they think about forecasting? They’re going to only buy what they really need to make sure they can deliver to their consumer. So they’re going to be much more conservative in their buying practices, which we actually attribute to a good thing. We actually think that’s a positive because that will ensure we don’t get back to prior days of excess inventory.
So when you see that slight moderation in the back half, it’s really then gauging how much inventory they want to end the year with and then start next year clean and ready to go again. So that’s how it’s kind of playing out. I think we’ll see great quarters in Q3 and Q4, but there’ll be a slight moderation as they pulled so much of that demand into Q1 and Q2 to really be prepared for those product launches for model year ’twenty six and ’twenty five, and you know how that cycle works. So that’s kind of the story. If that doesn’t make sense, I can clarify further.
***Important Note*** – I am not an expert on Giant Manufacturing and as always – none of this investing advice. Please realize, I may be flat wrong in some (or all) of my analysis. I haven’t covered the stock for many quarters, and have not studied more nuanced parts of the company. This was a quick read through, please treat it as such.
Thanks for reading Jeff’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.